교사의 직무만족과 학교장의 지도성과의 관계 연구

Abstract

1. Purpose of study The purpose of this study was established as follows, under the premise that whether the teachers are satisfied with the duty is more important than any other factors in the school education, and that this has the close relation with the leadership of principals. First, to extract the factors of duty satisfaction of teachers and the types of leadership of principals in the school system. Second, to grasp the actual state on the level of teachers' duty satisfaction and the types of principals' leadership. Third, to study the relation between the duty satisfaction of teachers and the principals' leadership. Fourth, to examine the type of leadership of principal for heightening the level of teachers' duty satisfaction closely. 2.Method of Study. The literature study and the survey study of actual state were performed simultaneously as the method of this study, and the measurement instrument, sampling object, and the disposal method of data are as follows; (1) Measurement Instrument So as to grasp the actual state on the level of duty satisfaction of teachers and on the types of leadership of principals, the questionnaires that the measurement scale of duty satisfaction of Kim, Kee Chong and " LBDQ " ( Leader Behavior Discription Questionnaire) of A.W.Halpin were corrected and supplemented more or less were used. (2) Sampling Object The object of questionnaire was made with 517 teachers at 24 public and private elementary schools in Seoul who were extracted at the researcher's option. (3) Handling Method of Data As for the data which appeard in the result of questionnaires,the level of teachers' duty satisfaction was measured and the types of principals' leadsership were classified by the statistical handling with computer (statistical package SAS), and the significance level was manifested by executing "t","F" and "X²" test in case of needs. 3. Result of Study The results which appeared in this study are as follows; First, the level of duty satisfaction of teachers was very low, as the average or less was 82.8 %. Second, as for the level of teachers' duty satisfaction, there weren't significant difference at the level by sex and the level by foundation. And, the more the educational career is, and the lower the school career at the time of employment is, the higher it was. Third, the level of duty satisfaction of teachers was very low in the side of recompense and welfare, on the other hand, it was very high in the side of duty contents and social position security. Fourth, as for the types of leadership of principals, effective leadership and ineffective leadership were most. Fifth, as for the recognition of teachers about the principals' leadership, there wasn't significant difference in the distinction of sex. And in case of the teacher at public school, the teacher who has much educational career, and the teacher whose school career at the time of employment is low, they showed the high reaction about the effective leadership. Sixth, the relation between the level of teachers' duty satisfaction and the type of leadership of principals had very deep relation with the correlation coefficient r = 0.62342. Seventh, as for the level of duty satisfaction of teachers, the more effective the type of principals' leadership is, the higher it was. And, the more ineffective the type of leadership of principal is, the lower it was. Eighth, it could be seen that the principal must display the effective leadership in the administration of school, so as to heighten the level of teachers' duty satisfaction.