鑑定評價 및 公示地價制度運營 改善方案에 關한 硏究

Abstract

It has been over 10 years since the Public Notice of Values and Appraisal of Lands was first adopted in April 1989. During that time, the system has contributed much to unifying land prices systems, establishing the foundation for implementation of the concept of public land ownership. However, a look at the system and its operation status clearly indicate that actual land prices are still far from publicly notified land prices and that the system is not able to propose proper prices due to lack of informatization and outdated appraisal techniques so that the system has not be able to gain the trust of the people. Further, having been many years since amendment, many inappropriate and outdated things can be found in the valuation and appraisal regulations when compared to advanced systems that fall in step with globalization, securitization, and informatization. This study, therefore, proposes the following improvements in order to secure appropriateness and reliability of the land appraisal and publicly notified land prices and to protect peoples property rights. First, publicly notified land prices are so alienated from actual land prices that their reliability and effectiveness are relatively low. The prices should be changed to reflect appropriate market prices and improvement plans drawn up and implemented upon close consultation with relevant organizations. Second, the concept of land features should be made clear so as to secure appropriateness and balance of the publicly notified land prices. In addition, the number of appraised categories should be increased and standards in the standard land price tables modified to suit the real situation. And, experts employed, training programs strengthened and incentives prepared to enhance the expertise of the public officials dealing with the system. Third, the Public Notice of Values and Appraisal of Lands, etc. Act should be amended to separate handle matters concerning publicly notified land prices and valuation & appraisal for advancement of the system. Fourth, since it can be said that publicly notification of land prices has been stabilized and have amassed much data and information, the valuation and appraisal periods should be changed to take place every two years. Fifth, stabilization and parity of land prices promoted by greatly reducing publicly notified land price correction criteria so as to prevent abuse of such correction criteria by parties with interest in the land prices at hand. Sixth, the valuation and appraisal regulations should be fully reviewed in step with the globalization, securitization and informatization of the real estate market. Measures that do not suit current reality should be abolished and new techniques adopted in the process. Seventh, testing categories and contents of examination for valuators and appraisers should be modified and adjusted with the objective of qualifying appropriate number of persons and to switch over to relative evaluation from absolute evaluation. Eighth, duties of valuators and appraisers should be supervised in order to specialize their duties and to be able to sort and request public notification of lands.9