學生의 敎師行動 知覺과 學業成績과의 相關關係 硏究

Abstract

The purpose of this study is clarify the relation between teacher behavior variables and academic achievement according students' perception. To find out this relationship, this study was conducted suing questionnair survey. Through the survey, theoretical and empirical studies that support upon the academic achievement of students were drewn, and investigator had questions as follows: Are there any differential effects of academic achievement depending on the intermediate factors such as Supporting Help, Negative Feedback, Work and Rule Orientation and High Expectation? To get answers to the proposed problems, investigator established four hypotheses: <Hyopthesis I> The correlation between the sub-variables (① Supporting Help ② Feedback ③ Work and Rule Orientation ④ High Expectation) Which constitute teacher behavior and academic achievement of students will be statistically significant according to sex of student(ⓐ male ⓑ female) <Hyopthesis II> The correlation between the sub-variables (① Supporting Help ② Feedback ③ Work and Rule Orientation ④ High Expectation) Which constitute teacher behavior and academic achievement of students will be statistically significant difference according to grade of student (ⓐ fourth grade ⓑ fifth grade ⓒ sixth) <Hyopthesis III> The sub-variables(① supporting Help ② Nagative Feedback ③ Work and Rule Orientation ④ High Expectation) Which constistute teacher behavior will be statistically significant difference according to sex of student (ⓐ male ⓑ female). <Hyopthesis IV> The sub-variables((① supporting Help ② Nagative Feedback ③ Work and Rule Orientation ④ High Expectation) Which constistute teacher behavior will be statistically significant difference according to grade of student (ⓐ fourth grade ⓑ fifth grade ⓒ sixth grade). To test the above hypothesis, Teacher Treatment Inventory was used to measure levels of teacher behavior. This questionnaire was distribute to 198 students of Hoo Pyong elementary School in Kang Won Do during the second semester of 1991. The results of tests are follows: 1. <Hypothesis I-ⓐ3>, <Hypothesis I-ⓑ1>, <Hypothesis I-ⓑ4>, <Hypothesis II-ⓐ1>, < Hypothesis II-ⓑ2>, <Hypothesis II-ⓒ2>, <Hypothesis II-ⓒ4>, <Hypothesis IV-1>, < Hypothesis IV-3> and < Hypothesis IV-4 > were accepted. 2. <Hypothesis I-ⓐ1>, <Hypothesis I-ⓐ2>, <Hypothesis I-ⓐ4>, <Hypothesis I -ⓑ2>, <Hypothesis I-ⓑ3>, <Hypothesis II-ⓐ2>, <Hypothesis II-ⓐ3>, <Hypothesis II -ⓐ4>, <Hypothesis II-ⓑ1>, <Hypothesis II-ⓑ3>, <Hypothesis II-ⓑ4>, <Hypothesis II -ⓒ1>, <Hypothesis III > and < Hypothesis IV-2 > were rejected.