學校長의 役割遂行과 敎師期待와의 差異點에 關한 比較硏究

Abstract

A. Method This investigation is to show the differences between the teacher's expectations and the role of the Principal. For its purpose, studies of actual situation and references were carried into effect. The inquiry was done in two occasions. At the first inquiry, I limited the acting area of the Principal by inquiring 256 teachers of 3 elementary schools in Seoul to three regions. At the second one, 600 teachers of 20 National, Public and Private schools freely selected were inquired and this time inquiry papers made by and investigator were used for its purpose. All the dates were computerized by SPSS program and it was verified by X² (chisquire) test and the level of statistical significance was set at 0.1 percent, 1 percent and 5 percent. B. Conclusion Comparing the differences between the expectations and the role based on the results of this investigation, I could have the following conclusion. First, in administration the Principal must dedicate much more to human relations and well-being of teachers than the control of service record. It means, the Principal got to administrate openly avoiding the control method. And so, must expand teacher's recreation activities and through unofficial organization or meetings give them free talking opportunities. Also, to make any decision must let the teachers participate in it and at the same time accept widly their opinion by democratical process. Secondly, the Principal has to consider the cooperation as the most importance of the meeting sessions. That means, do not consider the meeting sessions as a tool of giving orders, but a deliberative body and in advance a executive body. Thirdly, the teaching plan must be made by concerting teachers and to manage the curriculum must collect teacher's opinions to manage accurately according to the school characteristics. So, to make the teaching plan and to manage the curriculum it' s better to avoid the participation of the executive only. Thus, from the beginning, the ordinary teachers also have to participate in different sections, and their opinions should be collected to make the teaching plan and to manage the curriculum. Fourth, the Principal must set the object of the curriculum in a whole some education and in a furtherance of educational environment. So must avoid the curriculum manage based on principal subjects. Thus subject charge system must be applied practically in art and physical education, the extracurricular activities must be managed normally to form perfect personality, and the living guidance must be totally depend on teachers, but it must limit to provide some information to get a responsible management of class. Fifth, the Principal needs to have some reform in personnel management on which the teacher's interest is mostly gathered. So it's good to form a personnel committee to improve the justice, to distribute teachers in charge of class based on the principle of the equal opportunity, and it's also desirable to reward, award and estimate teacher' s service record according to the contributions for the school. And the appointment of head teacher and the division of duties must be done according to the capability of each one.